Powell v. Alabama
On March 25th, 1932, nine African-American youths, whom their defense attorney maintained were ‘young, ignorant, and illiterate’, were accused of raping 2 Caucasian women while illegally on board a train carrying the victims. The initial trials lasted only 1 day and the 9 defendants were all sentenced to death; however, the defendants claimed that their public defense attorney did not perform adequate services with regard to their respective representation. Upon the appeal, the Supreme Court undertook supplemental judicial review of the case:
The Background of Powell v. Alabama
The defendants were later attributed with the moniker ‘The Scottsboro Boys’
The Case Profile of Powell v. Alabama
The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘Powell v. Alabama’:
Date of the Trial: October 10th, 1932
Accused Criminal Activity: The following criminal activity and charges were cited by Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Andy Wright, and Olen Montgomery against the State of Alabama within the appeal brought forth subsequent to the initial ruling:
The defendants maintained that their rights to Habeas Corpus were violated; habeas corpus entitles all individuals to the right to a trial in a court of law – they added that they were not granted the right to effective legal representation or acknowledgement of pertinent details regarding the legal hearing
United States Reports Case Number: 287 U.S. 45
Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: November 7th, 1932
Legal Venue of Powell v. Alabama: The Supreme Court of the United States
Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes
Involved Parties:
Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Andy Wright, and Olen Montgomery; Plaintiff(s) – Powell v. Alabama
The State of Alabama; Defendant - Powell v. Alabama
Verdict Delivered: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Powell, stating that the rights afforded to the defendants in the 14th Amendment were violated through insufficient legal representation and the general failure of the State to adhere to due process; although not the catalyst for the verdict, the Supreme Court ruled that the 6th Amendment Rights entitled to the defendants were violated.
Related Topics
- Braden v. United States
- Hill v. Wallace
- Bates v. City of Little Rock
- Cammarano v. United States
- Estes v. Texas
- McKaskle v. Wiggins
- California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley
- United States v. Janis