C6-02-318, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Todd Jeffrey Askerooth, Appellant.

Case Date: 12/27/2007
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: C6-02-318, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs.

State of Minnesota

 

In Supreme Court

 

C6-02-318

 

 

Court of Appeals

Anderson, Paul H., J.

Concurring specially, Anderson, Russell A.

and Hanson, JJ.

 

 

State of Minnesota,

 

                                    Respondent,

 

Filed: June 17, 2004

Office of Appellate Courts

Todd Jeffrey Askerooth,

 

                                    Appellant.

 

S y l l a b u s

Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution requires that a search or seizure during a traffic stop be reasonable even when a minor law has been violated.

Article I, Section 10 of the Minnesota Constitution requires that each incremental intrusion during a traffic stop be individualized to the person toward whom the intrusion is directed and tied to and justified by one of the following: (1) the original purpose of the stop, (2) independent probable cause, or (3) reasonableness, as defined in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). 

Police officer who made a stop for a minor traffic violation, confined the driver in the back seat of a squad car, and articulated that his only basis for confining the driver was the officer