State of Maine v. John Martin
Case Date: 09/27/2004
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 2004 ME 122
Download PDF Back to Opinions Page
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2004 ME 122 Docket: Pen-04-129 Submitted On Briefs: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 27, 2004
Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.
STATE OF MAINE
v.
JOHN MARTIN
RUDMAN, J. [¶1] John Martin appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Jabar, J.) convicting him of criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 209(1) (1983). Martin contends that the Superior Court erred in classifying the crime as a Class C crime and that the crime he was convicted of is designated by statute as a Class D crime. We disagree and affirm the judgment of conviction. [¶2] Martin asserts that there is no statutory authority for the court to adjudge him guilty of a Class C crime because the Criminal Code defines criminal threatening as a Class D crime. He further contends that the statutes merely provide that the use of a dangerous weapon in committing a crime can enhance the sentence that may be imposed, but do not change the class of the crime. [¶3] Section 4 of title 17‑A provides: § 4. Classification of crimes in this Code
1. Except for murder, all crimes defined by this Code are classified for purposes of sentencing as Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E crimes.
17-A M.R.S.A. § 4 (1983).
[¶4] Section 1252(4) of title 17‑A provides: [I]f the State pleads and proves that a Class B, C, D, or E crime was committed with the use of a dangerous weapon then the sentencing class for such crime is one class higher than it would otherwise be.
17‑A M.R.S.A. § 1252(4) (1983) (emphasis added).
[¶5] The legislative intent is clear. The jury found Martin guilty of criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon. Although criminal threatening by itself for purposes of sentencing would be a Class D crime, the sentencing class for the crime Martin committed is one class higher: a Class C crime. The entry is: Judgment affirmed.
Attorneys for State:
R. Christopher Almy, District Attorney C. Daniel Wood, Asst. Dist. Atty. 97 Hammond Street Bangor, ME 04401
Attorney for defendant:
Steven J. Lyman, Esq. 96 Harlow Street Bangor, ME 04401 |