§ 103. Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter
(a)
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section
102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
(b)
(1)
Notwithstanding subsection (a), and upon timely election by the applicant for patent to proceed under this subsection, a biotechnological process using or resulting in a composition of matter that is novel under section
102 and nonobvious under subsection (a) of this section shall be considered nonobvious if—
(2)
A patent issued on a process under paragraph (1)—
(B)
shall, if such composition of matter is claimed in another patent, be set to expire on the same date as such other patent, notwithstanding section
154.
(c)
(1)
Subject matter developed by another person, which qualifies as prior art only under one or more of subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section
102 of this title, shall not preclude patentability under this section where the subject matter and the claimed invention were, at the time the claimed invention was made, owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person.
(2)
For purposes of this subsection, subject matter developed by another person and a claimed invention shall be deemed to have been owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person if—
(A)
the claimed invention was made by or on behalf of parties to a joint research agreement that was in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made;