Section 25-7-6.22 - Rebuttable presumption that second job income not to be considered inestablishing support obligation.
25-7-6.22. Rebuttable presumption that second job income not to be considered in establishing support obligation. If a parent is employed full-time at a rate of pay that equals or exceeds the state's minimum wage, it is presumed that a parent's second job income is not to be considered in establishing a support obligation. This presumption may be rebutted by evidence that the income source was available to pay expenses related to the child when the parent initially became obligated for the support of the child pursuant to § 25-7-6.1.
Source: SL 2005, ch 134, § 5; SL 2009, ch 130, § 8.