5571.1 - Appeals from ordinances, resolutions, maps, etc.

     § 5571.1.  Appeals from ordinances, resolutions, maps, etc.        (a)  Applicability; court of common pleas.--            (1)  This section shall apply to any appeal raising        questions relating to an alleged defect in the process of or        procedure for enactment or adoption of any ordinance,        resolution, map or similar action of a political subdivision.            (2)  An appeal pursuant to this section shall be to the        court of common pleas.        (b)  Appeals of defects in statutory procedure.--            (1)  Any appeal raising questions relating to an alleged        defect in statutory procedure shall be brought within 30 days        of the intended effective date of the ordinance.            (2)  Except as provided in subsection (c), it is the        express intent of the General Assembly that this 30-day        limitation shall apply regardless of the ultimate validity of        the challenged ordinance.        (c)  Exemption from limitation.--An appeal shall be exempt     from the time limitation in subsection (b) if the party bringing     the appeal establishes that, because of the particular nature of     the alleged defect in statutory procedure, the application of     the time limitation under subsection (b) would result in an     impermissible deprivation of constitutional rights.        (d)  Presumptions.--Notwithstanding any other provision of     law, appeals pursuant to this section shall be subject to and in     accordance with the following:            (1)  An ordinance shall be presumed to be valid and to        have been enacted or adopted in strict compliance with        statutory procedure.            (2)  In all cases in which an appeal filed in court more        than two years after the intended effective date of the        ordinance is allowed to proceed in accordance with subsection        (c), the political subdivision involved and residents and        landowners within the political subdivision shall be presumed        to have substantially relied upon the validity and        effectiveness of the ordinance.            (3)  An ordinance shall not be found void from inception        unless the party alleging the defect in statutory procedure        meets the burden of proving the elements set forth in        subsection (e).        (e)  Burden of proof.--Notwithstanding any other provision of     law, an ordinance shall not be found void from inception except     as follows:            (1)  In the case of an appeal brought within the 30-day        time limitation of subsection (b), the party alleging the        defect must meet the burden of proving that there was a        failure to strictly comply with statutory procedure.            (2)  In the case of an appeal which is exempt from the        30-day time limitation in accordance with subsection (c), the        party alleging the defect must meet the burden of proving        each of the following:                (i)  That there was a failure to strictly comply with            statutory procedure.                (ii)  That there was a failure to substantially            comply with statutory procedure which resulted in            insufficient notification to the public of impending            changes in or the existence of the ordinance, so that the            public would be prevented from commenting on those            changes and intervening, if necessary, or from having            knowledge of the existence of the ordinance.                (iii)  That there exist facts sufficient to rebut any            presumption that may exist pursuant to subsection (d)(2)            that would, unless rebutted, result in a determination            that the ordinance is not void from inception.        (f)  Void ordinances.--A determination that an ordinance is     void from inception shall not affect any previously acquired     rights of property owners who have exercised good faith reliance     on the validity of the ordinance prior to the determination.        (g)  Definitions.--As used in this section, the following     words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this     subsection:        "Intended effective date."  Notwithstanding the validity of     the challenged ordinance, the effective date specified in the     challenged ordinance or, if no effective date is specified, the     date 60 days after the date the ordinance would have been     finally adopted but for the alleged defect in the process of     enactment or adoption.        "Ordinance."  An ordinance, resolution, map or similar action     of a political subdivision.        "Statutory procedure."  The preenactment and postenactment     procedures prescribed by statute or ordinance in adopting an     ordinance.     (July 4, 2008, P.L.325, No.40, eff. imd.)        2008 Amendment.  Act 40 added section 5571.1.        Cross References.  Section 5571.1 is referred to in section     5571 of this title.