26.1-51 Self-Critical Insurance Analysis Privilege
Loading PDF...
assessment, audit, or investigation for the purpose of identifying or preventing
noncompliance with, or promoting compliance with, laws, regulations, orders, or
industry or professional standards, which is conducted by or on behalf of an insurer
licensed or regulated under this title, or which involves an activity regulated under
this title.3."Insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document" means a document
prepared as a result of or in connection with an insurance compliance audit. An
insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document may include a written
response to the findings of an insurance compliance audit.An insurancecompliance self-critical analysis audit document may include, as applicable, field
notes and records of observations, workpapers, findings, opinions, suggestions,
conclusions,drafts,memoranda,drawings,photographs,exhibits,computer-generated or electronically recorded information, telephone records,
maps, charts, graphs, and surveys, provided this supporting information is collected
or developed for the primary purpose and in the course of an insurance compliance
audit. An insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document also includes:a.An insurance compliance audit report prepared by an auditor, who may be an
employee of the insurer or an independent contractor, which may include the
scope of the audit, the information gained in the audit, and conclusions and
recommendations, with exhibits and appendices;b.Memoranda and documents analyzing portions or all of the insurance
compliance audit report and discussing potential implementation issues;c.An implementation plan that addresses correcting past noncompliance,
improving current compliance, and preventing future noncompliance; ord.Analytic data generated in the course of conducting the insurance compliance
audit.4."Insurer" means an insurance company, nonprofit service corporation, or health
maintenance organization organized under the laws of this state or a foreign
insurancecompany,nonprofitservicecorporation,orhealthmaintenanceorganization authorized to do business in this state.26.1-51-02. Self-critical analysis privilege created - Scope. An insurance complianceself-critical analysis privilege is created to protect the confidentiality of insurance compliance
self-critical analysis documents or communications in regard to their content relating to voluntary
internal compliance audits conducted by insurers and persons in regard to activities regulated
under this title, both to conduct voluntary internal audits of its compliance programs and
management systems, and to assess and improve compliance with state and federal statutes,
rules, and orders. The insurance compliance self-critical analysis privilege applies to all litigation
or administrative proceedings pending on August 1, 1999.26.1-51-03. Insurance compliance self-critical analysis document not discoverableor admissible.Except as provided in sections 26.1-51-05, 26.1-51-06, and 26.1-51-07, aninsurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document is privileged information and is notPage No. 1discoverable or admissible evidence in any legal action in any civil, criminal, or administrative
proceeding.The privilege is a matter of substantive law of this state and is not merely aprocedural matter governing administrative, civil, or criminal procedures in the courts of this
state.26.1-51-04. Application of privilege. If an insurer, person, or entity performs or directsthe performance of an insurance compliance audit, an officer, employee, or agent involved with
the insurance compliance audit, or any consultant who is hired for the purpose of performing the
insurance compliance audit, may not be examined in any civil, criminal, or administrative
proceeding as to the insurance compliance audit or any insurance compliance self-critical
analysis audit document. This section does not apply if it is determined under section 26.1-51-06
or 26.1-51-07 that the privilege does not apply.26.1-51-05. Submission to commissioner.1.Upon request of the commissioner, an insurer must submit an insurance compliance
self-critical analysis audit document to the commissioner, or the commissioner's
designee, as a confidential document under the provisions of section 26.1-03-19.4
without waiving the privilege set forth in this chapter to which the insurer would
otherwise be entitled.However, the provisions of sections 26.1-03-19.3 and26.1-03-19.4 permitting the commissioner to make confidential documents public
and accessible to the national association of insurance commissioners does not
apply to the insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit documents voluntarily
submitted.To the extent the commissioner has the authority to compel thedisclosure of an insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document under
other provisions of applicable law, any report furnished to the commissioner may not
be provided to any other person or entity and must be accorded the same
confidentiality and other protections as provided above for voluntarily submitted
documents.Any use of an insurance compliance self-critical analysis auditdocument furnished as a result of a request of the commissioner, whether under a
claim of authority to compel disclosure or not, is limited to determining whether any
disclosed defects in an insurer's policies or procedures or inappropriate treatment of
customers has been remedied or that an appropriate plan for their remedy is in
place. The commissioner may not impose any type of administrative fine or penalty
as to any area addressed or matter covered in an insurance compliance self-critical
analysis audit document furnished at the commissioner's request, except when there
is clear and convincing evidence that the insurer failed to undertake reasonable
corrective action, eliminate inappropriate treatment of customers, or failed to
implement an appropriate plan to rectify any noncompliance with state and federal
statutes, rules, and orders.2.An insurer's insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document submitted to
the commissioner remains subject to all applicable statutory or common-law
privileges, including the work product doctrine, attorney-client privilege, or the
subsequent remedial measures exclusion.An insurance compliance self-criticalanalysis audit document submitted to and in the possession of the commissioner
remains the property of the insurer and is not subject to any disclosure or production
under section 44-04-18.3.Disclosure of an insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document to a
governmental agency, whether voluntary or pursuant to compulsion of law, does not
constitute a waiver of the privilege with respect to any other person or any other
governmental agency.26.1-51-06. Waiver of privilege by insurer - Grounds for determination of privilege -Civil, administrative, or criminal proceedings.Page No. 21.The self-critical analysis privilege does not apply to the extent that it is expressly
waived by the insurer that prepared or caused to be prepared the insurance
compliance self-critical analysis audit document.2.In a civil or administrative proceeding, a court of record, after an in-camera review,
may require disclosure of material for which the privilege is asserted, if the court
determines one of the following:a.The privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose; orb.The material is not subject to the privilege.3.In a criminal proceeding, a court of record, after an in-camera review, may require
disclosure of material for which the privilege is asserted, if the court determines one
of the following:a.The privilege is asserted for a fraudulent purpose;b.The material is not subject to the privilege; orc.The material contains evidence relevant to commission of a criminal offense,
and all three of the following factors are present:(1)The commissioner, state's attorney, or attorney general has a compelling
need for the information;(2)The information is not otherwise available; and(3)The commissioner, state's attorney, or attorney general is unable to
obtain the substantial equivalent of the information by any other means
without incurring unreasonable cost and delay.26.1-51-07. Determination of privilege - Procedure.1.If a person seeks from an insurer communications involving an insurance
compliance audit or any insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document
during the course of a pending civil or criminal proceeding, the insurer may assert
the self-critical analysis privilege and provide the information set forth in
subsection 6 during the course of those proceedings just as any other privilege is
asserted in the courts of this state. If the court is required to make a determination
as to the privilege, the court shall follow the procedure and conditions set forth in
subsection 5.2.If there is a pending administrative proceeding, or there is no pending civil or
criminal proceeding, the commissioner, state's attorney, or attorney general may
serve on an insurer a written request by certified mail for disclosure of an insurance
compliance self-critical analysis audit document.Within thirty days after thecommissioner, state's attorney, or attorney general serves on an insurer a written
request by certified mail for disclosure of an insurance compliance self-critical
analysis audit document, the insurer that prepared or caused the document to be
prepared may file with the appropriate court a petition requesting an in-camera
hearing on whether the insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document or
portions of the document are privileged under this chapter or subject to disclosure.
The court has jurisdiction over a petition filed by an insurer under this subsection
requesting an in-camera hearing on whether the insurance compliance self-critical
analysis document or portions of the document are privileged or subject to
disclosure. Failure by the insurer to file a petition waives the privilege for only the
specific request made.Page No. 33.An insurer asserting the insurance compliance self-critical analysis privilege in
response to a request for disclosure under this section shall include in its request for
an in-camera hearing all of the information set forth in subsection 6.4.Upon the filing of a petition under this section, the court shall issue an order
scheduling, within forty-five days after the filing of the petition, an in-camera hearing
to determine whether the insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document
or portions of the document are privileged under this chapter or subject to
disclosure.5.The court, after an in-camera review, may require disclosure of material for which
the privilege is asserted if the court determines, based upon its in-camera review,
that any one of the conditions set forth in subsection 2 of section 26.1-51-06 is
applicable as to a civil or administrative proceeding or that any one of the conditions
set forth in subsection 3 of section 26.1-51-06 is applicable as to a criminal
proceeding.Upon making such determination, the court may only compel thedisclosure of those portions of an insurance compliance self-critical analysis
document relevant to issues in dispute in the underlying proceeding. A compelled
disclosure may not be considered to be a public document or be deemed to be a
waiver of the privilege for any other civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding. An
insurer unsuccessfully opposing disclosure may apply to the court for an appropriate
order protecting the document from further disclosure.6.An insurer asserting the insurance compliance self-critical analysis privilege in
response to a request for disclosure under this section shall provide at the time of
making and filing any objection to the disclosure all of the following information:a.The date of the insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document;b.The identity of the entity conducting the audit;c.The general nature of the activities covered by the insurance compliance audit;
andd.An identification of the portions of the insurance compliance self-critical
analysis audit document for which the privilege is being asserted.26.1-51-08.Privilege - Burden of proof - Stipulation.An insurer asserting theinsurance compliance self-critical analysis privilege set forth in this chapter has the burden of
demonstrating the applicability of the privilege. Once an insurer has established the applicability
of the privilege, a party seeking disclosure has the burden of proving that the privilege is asserted
for a fraudulent purpose.The commissioner, state's attorney, or attorney general seekingdisclosure of the privilege has the burden of proving the elements set forth in subdivisions a
and c of subsection 3 of section 26.1-51-06.The parties may at any time stipulate in proceedings under section 26.1-51-06 or26.1-51-07 to entry of an order directing whether the specific information contained in an
insurance compliance self-critical analysis audit document is or is not subject to the privilege
provided under this chapter. Any such stipulation may be limited to the instant proceeding and,
absent specific language to the contrary, is not applicable to any other proceeding.26.1-51-09. Nonapplication of privilege. The self-critical analysis privilege set forth inthis chapter does not extend to:1.Documents, communications, data, reports, or other information expressly required
to be collected, developed, maintained, or reported to a regulatory agency pursuant
to this title, or other federal or state law;2.Information obtained by observation or monitoring by any regulatory agency; orPage No. 43.Information obtained from a source independent of the insurance compliance audit.Page No. 5Document Outlinechapter 26.1-51 self-critical insurance analysis privilege