22-02 Indemnity
Loading PDF...
of doing it to be unlawful.22-02-03. Indemnity against wrongful act done is valid - Exception. An agreementto indemnify a person against an act already done is valid, even though the act was known to be
wrongful, unless it was a felony.22-02-04. Indemnity against acts of certain person includes agents. An agreementto indemnify against the acts of a certain person applies not only to that person's acts and their
consequences, but also to those of that person's agents.22-02-05. Indemnification of several persons includes each person. An agreementto indemnify several persons applies to each unless a contrary intention appears.22-02-06.Indemnitor jointly and separately liable.One who indemnifies anotherperson against an act to be done by the latter is liable jointly with the person indemnified and
separately to every person injured by such act.22-02-07.Rules applied in interpretation of a contract of indemnity.In theinterpretation of a contract of indemnity, unless a contrary intention appears, the following rules
are to be applied:1.Upon an indemnity against liability, expressly or in other equivalent terms, the
person indemnified is entitled to recover upon becoming liable.2.Upon an indemnity against claims, demands, damages, or costs, expressly or in
other equivalent terms, the person indemnified is not entitled to recover without
payment thereof.3.An indemnity against claims, demands, or liability, expressly or in other equivalent
terms, embraces the costs of defense against such claims, demands, or liability
incurred in good faith and in the exercise of reasonable discretion.4.The person indemnifying is bound, on the request of the person indemnified, to
defend actions or proceedings brought against the latter in respect to the matters
embraced by the indemnity, but the person indemnified has the right to conduct such
defense if that person chooses to do so.5.If, after request, the person indemnifying neglects to defend the person indemnified,
a recovery against the latter, suffered by the latter in good faith, is conclusive in the
latter's favor against the former.6.If the person indemnifying, whether that person is a principal or a surety in the
agreement, has not had reasonable notice of action or proceedings against the
person indemnified or is not allowed to control its defense, judgment against the
latter is only presumptive evidence against the former.7.A stipulation that a judgment against the person indemnified shall be conclusive
upon the person indemnifying is inapplicable if the person indemnifying had a good
defense upon the merits which, by want of ordinary care, the person indemnifying
failed to establish in the action.Page No. 122-02-08. Engagement to answer for violation of duty of another - Reimbursement.When one person at the request of another person engages to answer in damages, whether
liquidated or unliquidated, for any violation of duty on the part of the latter, the former is entitled to
be reimbursed in the same manner as a surety for whatever the former may pay.22-02-09. When sureties in indemnity contracts called bail - Provisions governingbail. Upon those contracts of indemnity which are taken in legal proceedings as security for the
performance of an obligation imposed or declared by the tribunals and known as undertakings or
recognizances, the sureties are called bail.22-02-10. Indemnity agreement in motor carrier transportation contracts void.1.As used in this section:a."Motor carrier transportation contract" means a contract, agreement, or
understanding covering the transportation of property for compensation or hire
by the motor carrier; entrance on property by the motor carrier for the purpose
of loading, unloading, or transporting property for compensation or hire; or a
service incidental to activity described in this subdivision, including storage of
property. The term does not include the uniform intermodal interchange and
facilities access agreement administered by the intermodal association of North
America or any other agreement providing for the interchange, use, or
possession of intermodal chassis, containers, or other intermodal equipment.b."Promisee" includes any agent, employee, servant, or independent contractor
who is directly responsible to the promisee. The term does not include a motor
carrier that is party to a motor carrier transportation contract with the promisee,
and does not include that motor carrier's agent, employee, servant, or
independent contractor directly responsible to that motor carrier.2.Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, any portion of a provision,
clause, covenant, or agreement contained in, collateral to, or affecting a motor
carrier contract which purports to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless, or has the
effect of indemnifying, defending, or holding harmless, the promisee from or against
any liability for loss or damage resulting from the negligence or intentional acts or
omissions of the promisee is void and unenforceable to the extent that the loss or
damage:a.Occurs during the motor carrier's presence on the promisee's premises and is
caused by or results from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the
promisee; orb.Is caused by or results from defects of the equipment used to transport the
promisee's property, unless the defects:(1)Relate to equipment owned by the motor carrier or as to which the motor
carrier has the responsibility to visually and audibly check before use; or(2)Were caused by or resulted from the negligent or intentional acts or
omissions of the motor carrier or the motor carrier's agency, employee,
vendor, or subcontractor.3.Under subsection 2, the motor carrier is responsible to visually and audibly check
before use of equipment as listed in exhibit A of the uniform intermodal interchange
and facilities access agreement that was in effect on November 4, 2008.Page No. 2Document Outlinechapter 22-02 indemnity