470.20 - Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts; corrective action upon reversal or modification.

§  470.20    Determination  of appeals by intermediate appellate courts;               corrective action upon reversal or modification.    Upon reversing or  modifying  a  judgment,  sentence  or  order  of  a  criminal court, an intermediate appellate court must take or direct such  corrective  action  as  is necessary and appropriate both to rectify any  injustice to the appellant resulting from the error or defect  which  is  the subject of the reversal or modification and to protect the rights of  the  respondent.    The  particular  corrective  action  to  be taken or  directed is governed in part by the following rules:    1.  Upon a reversal of a judgment after  trial  for  error  or  defect  which  resulted  in prejudice to the defendant or deprived him of a fair  trial, the court must, whether such reversal be  on  the  law  or  as  a  matter  of  discretion  in the interest of justice, order a new trial of  the accusatory instrument and remit the case to the criminal  court  for  such action.    2.   Upon a reversal of a judgment after trial for legal insufficiency  of trial evidence, the court must dismiss the accusatory instrument.    3.    Upon  a  modification  of  a  judgment  after  trial  for  legal  insufficiency  of trial evidence with respect to one or more but not all  of the offenses of which the defendant was  convicted,  the  court  must  dismiss  the  count or counts of the accusatory instrument determined to  be legally unsupported and must otherwise affirm the judgment.  In  such  case,  it  must  either reduce the total sentence to that imposed by the  criminal court upon the counts with respect to  which  the  judgment  is  affirmed  or  remit  the case to the criminal court for re-sentence upon  such counts; provided that nothing contained in this paragraph precludes  further sentence reduction in the  exercise  of  the  appellate  court's  discretion pursuant to subdivision six.    4.    Upon  a  modification  of a judgment after trial which reduces a  conviction of a crime to one for a lesser included  offense,  the  court  must  remit  the  case  to  the criminal court with a direction that the  latter sentence the defendant accordingly.    5.  Upon a reversal or modification of a judgment after trial upon the  ground that the verdict, either in its entirety or  with  respect  to  a  particular count or counts, is against the weight of the trial evidence,  the court must dismiss the accusatory instrument or any reversed count.    6.    Upon modifying a judgment or reversing a sentence as a matter of  discretion in the interest of justice upon the ground that the  sentence  is  unduly  harsh  or  severe, the court must itself impose some legally  authorized lesser sentence.