RS 22:1131 Second level review
§1131. Second level review
A. An MNRO shall establish a second level review process to give covered persons who are dissatisfied with the first level review decision the option to request a review at which the covered person has the right to appear in person before authorized representatives of the MNRO. An MNRO shall provide covered persons with adequate notice of this option.
B. An MNRO shall conduct a second level review for each appeal. Appeals shall be evaluated by an appropriate clinical peer or peers in the same or similar specialty as would typically manage the case being reviewed. The clinical peer shall not have been involved in the initial adverse determination. A majority of any review panel used shall be comprised of persons who were not previously involved in the appeal. However, a person who was previously involved with the appeal may be a member of the panel or appear before the panel to present information or answer questions. The panel shall have the legal authority to bind the MNRO and the health benefit plan to the panel's decision.
C. An MNRO shall ensure that a majority of the persons reviewing a second level appeal are health care professionals who have appropriate expertise. An MNRO shall issue a copy of the written decision to a provider who submits an appeal on behalf of a covered person. In cases where there has been a denial of service, the reviewing health care professional shall not have a financial incentive or interest in the outcome of the review.
D. The procedures for conducting a second level review shall include the following:
(1) The review panel shall schedule and hold a review meeting within forty-five working days of receiving a request from a covered person for a second level review. The review meeting shall be held during regular business hours at a location reasonably accessible to the covered person. In cases where a face-to-face meeting is not practical for geographic reasons, an MNRO shall offer the covered person the opportunity to communicate with the review panel, at the MNRO's expense, by conference call, video conferencing, or other appropriate technology. The covered person shall be notified of the time and place of the review meeting in writing at least fifteen working days in advance of the review date; such notice shall also advise the covered person of his rights as specified in Paragraph (3) of this Subsection. The MNRO shall not unreasonably deny a request for postponement of a review meeting made by a covered person.
(2) Upon the request of a covered person, an MNRO shall provide to the covered person all relevant information that is not confidential or privileged.
(3) A covered person shall have the right to the following:
(a) Attend the second level review.
(b) Present his case to the review panel.
(c) Submit supporting material both before and at the review meeting.
(d) Ask questions of any representative of the MNRO.
(4) The covered person's right to a fair review shall not be made conditional on the covered person's appearance at the review.
(5) For second level appeals, a duly licensed and appropriate clinical peer shall be required to concur with any adverse determination made by the review panel.
(6) The MNRO shall issue a written decision to the covered person within five working days of completing the review meeting. The decision shall include the following:
(a) The title and qualifying credentials of the appropriate clinical peer affirming an adverse determination.
(b) A statement of the nature of the appeal and all pertinent facts.
(c) The rationale for the decision.
(d) Reference to evidence or documentation used in making that decision.
(e) The instructions for requesting a written statement of the clinical rationale, including the clinical review criteria used to make the determination.
(f) Notice of the covered person's right to an external review.
E. An MNRO may establish a procedure that requires that a health care provider pay the cost of a second level appeal when all of the following occur:
(1) The health care provider has made the appeal on behalf of a covered person.
(2) The result of the second level appeal is that the MNRO's previous adverse determination is upheld.
(3) The MNRO's records indicate a consistent practice by the health care provider of requesting second level reviews in an extremely high percentage of cases that were not warranted by available medical information.
(4) The commissioner approves the MNRO's action to require payment by the health care provider.
Acts 1999, No. 401, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 2000; Acts 2004, No. 450, §1; Redesignated from R.S. 22:3080 by Acts 2008, No. 415, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 2009.
NOTE: See Acts 1999, No. 401, §2, regarding applicability.
NOTE: Former R.S. 22:1131 redesignated as R.S. 22:1541 by Acts 2008, No. 415, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 2009.