135C.38 - INSPECTIONS UPON COMPLAINTS.

        135C.38  INSPECTIONS UPON COMPLAINTS.
         1. a.  Upon receipt of a complaint made in accordance with
      section 135C.37, the department or resident advocate committee shall
      make a preliminary review of the complaint.  Unless the department or
      committee concludes that the complaint is intended to harass a
      facility or a licensee or is without reasonable basis, the department
      or committee shall make or cause to be made an on-site inspection of
      the health care facility which is the subject of the complaint within
      the time period determined pursuant to the following guidelines,
      which period shall commence on the date of receipt of the complaint:
         (1)  For nursing facilities, an on-site inspection shall be
      initiated as follows:
         (a)  Within two working days for a complaint determined by the
      department or committee to be an alleged immediate jeopardy
      situation.
         (b)  Within ten working days for a complaint determined by the
      department or committee to be an alleged high-level, nonimmediate
      jeopardy situation.
         (c)  Within forty-five calendar days for a complaint determined by
      the department or committee to be an alleged nonimmediate jeopardy
      situation, other than a high-level situation.
         (2)  For all other types of health care facilities, an on-site
      inspection shall be initiated as follows:
         (a)  Within two working days for a complaint determined by the
      department or committee to be an alleged immediate jeopardy
      situation.
         (b)  Within twenty working days for a complaint determined by the
      department or committee to be an alleged high-level, nonimmediate
      jeopardy situation.
         (c)  Within forty-five calendar days for a complaint determined by
      the department or committee to be an alleged nonimmediate jeopardy
      situation, other than a high-level situation.
         b.  The complaint investigation shall include, at a minimum,
      an interview with the complainant, the alleged perpetrator, and the
      victim of the alleged violation, if the victim is able to
      communicate, if the complainant, alleged perpetrator, or victim is
      identifiable, and if the complainant, alleged perpetrator, or victim
      is available.  Additionally, witnesses who have knowledge of facts
      related to the complaint shall be interviewed, if identifiable and
      available.  The names of witnesses may be obtained from the
      complainant or the victim.  The files of the facility may be reviewed
      to ascertain the names of staff persons on duty at the time relevant
      to the complaint.  The department shall apply a preponderance of the
      evidence standard in determining whether or not a complaint is
      substantiated.  For the purposes of this subsection, "a
      preponderance of the evidence standard" means that the evidence,
      considered and compared with the evidence opposed to it, produces the
      belief in a reasonable mind that the allegations are more likely true
      than not true.  "A preponderance of the evidence standard" does
      not require that the investigator personally witnessed the alleged
      violation.
         c.  The department may refer to the resident advocate
      committee of a facility any complaint received by the department
      regarding that facility, for initial evaluation and appropriate
      action by the committee.
         2. a.  The complainant shall be promptly informed of the
      result of any action taken by the department or committee in the
      matter.  The complainant shall also be notified of the name, address,
      and telephone number of the designated protection and advocacy agency
      if the alleged violation involves a facility with one or more
      residents with developmental disabilities or mental illness.
         b.  Upon conclusion of the investigation, the department shall
      notify the complainant of the results.  The notification shall
      include a statement of the factual findings as determined by the
      investigator, the statutory or regulatory provisions alleged to have
      been violated, and a summary of the reasons for which the complaint
      was or was not substantiated.
         c.  The department shall mail the notification to the
      complainant without charge.  Upon the request of the complainant, the
      department shall mail to the complainant, without charge, a copy of
      the most recent final findings regarding compliance with licensing
      requirements by the facility against which the complaint was filed.
         d.  A person who is dissatisfied with any aspect of the
      department's handling of the complaint may contact the long- term
      care resident's advocate, established pursuant to section 231.42, or
      may contact the protection and advocacy agency designated pursuant to
      section 135C.2 if the complaint relates to a resident with a
      developmental disability or a mental illness.
         3.  An inspection made pursuant to a complaint filed under section
      135C.37 need not be limited to the matter or matters included in the
      complaint.  However, the inspection shall not be a general inspection
      unless the complaint inspection coincides with a scheduled general
      inspection or unless in the course of the complaint investigation a
      violation is evident to the inspector.  Upon arrival at the facility
      to be inspected, the inspector shall show identification to the
      person in charge of the facility and state that an inspection is to
      be made, before beginning the inspection.  Upon request of either the
      complainant or the department or committee, the complainant or the
      complainant's representative or both may be allowed the privilege of
      accompanying the inspector during any on-site inspection made
      pursuant to this section.  The inspector may cancel the privilege at
      any time if the inspector determines that the privacy of any resident
      of the facility to be inspected would otherwise be violated.  The
      protection and dignity of the resident shall be given first priority
      by the inspector and others.
         4.  If upon an inspection of a facility by its resident advocate
      committee pursuant to this section, the committee advises the
      department of any circumstance believed to constitute a violation of
      this chapter or of any rule adopted pursuant to it, the committee
      shall similarly advise the facility at the same time.  If the
      facility's licensee or administrator disagrees with the conclusion of
      the committee regarding the supposed violation, an informal
      conference may be requested and if requested shall be arranged by the
      department as provided in section 135C.42 before a citation is
      issued.  If the department thereafter issues a citation pursuant to
      the committee's finding, the facility shall not be entitled to a
      second informal conference on the same violation and the citation
      shall be considered affirmed.  The facility cited may proceed under
      section 135C.43 if it so desires.  
         Section History: Early Form
         [C77, 79, 81, § 135C.38] 
         Section History: Recent Form
         87 Acts, ch 234, § 430; 89 Acts, ch 241, § 4; 91 Acts, ch 107, §
      5, 6; 99 Acts, ch 129, §7, 8; 2000 Acts, ch 1180, §2; 2007 Acts, ch
      93, §2
         Referred to in § 135C.16, 135C.25, 135C.39