17A.15 - FINAL DECISIONS -- PROPOSED DECISIONS -- CONCLUSIVENESS -- REVIEW BY THE AGENCY.

        17A.15  FINAL DECISIONS -- PROPOSED DECISIONS --
      CONCLUSIVENESS -- REVIEW BY THE AGENCY.
         1.  When the agency presides at the reception of the evidence in a
      contested case, the decision of the agency is a final decision.
         2.  When the agency did not preside at the reception of the
      evidence in a contested case, the presiding officer shall make a
      proposed decision.  Findings of fact shall be prepared by the officer
      presiding at the reception of the evidence in a contested case unless
      the officer becomes unavailable to the agency.  If the officer is
      unavailable, the findings of fact may be prepared by another person
      qualified to be a presiding officer who has read the record, unless
      demeanor of witnesses is a substantial factor.  If demeanor is a
      substantial factor and the presiding officer is unavailable, the
      portions of the hearing involving demeanor shall be heard again or
      the case shall be dismissed.
         3.  When the presiding officer makes a proposed decision, that
      decision then becomes the final decision of the agency without
      further proceedings unless there is an appeal to, or review on motion
      of, the agency within the time provided by rule.  On appeal from or
      review of the proposed decision, the agency has all the power which
      it would have in initially making the final decision except as it may
      limit the issues on notice to the parties or by rule.  The agency may
      reverse or modify any finding of fact if a preponderance of the
      evidence will support a determination to reverse or modify such a
      finding, or may reverse or modify any conclusion of law that the
      agency finds to be in error.  In cases where there is an appeal from
      a proposed decision or where a proposed decision is reviewed on
      motion of the agency, an opportunity shall be afforded to each party
      to file exceptions, present briefs and, with the consent of the
      agency, present oral arguments to the agency members who are to
      render the final decision.
         4.  This section shall not preclude an agency from instituting a
      system whereby the proposed decision of a presiding officer in a
      contested case may be appealed to, or reviewed on motion of, a body
      consisting of one or more persons that is between the presiding
      officer and the agency.  If an agency institutes such a system of
      intermediate review, the proposed decision of the presiding officer
      becomes the final decision of the agency without further proceedings
      unless there is an appeal to, or review on motion of, the
      intermediate reviewing body within the time provided by rule.  An
      intermediate reviewing body may be vested with all or a part of the
      power which it would have in initially making the decision.  A
      decision of such an intermediate reviewing body is also a proposed
      decision and shall become the final decision of the agency without
      further proceedings unless there is an appeal to, or review on motion
      of, the agency within the time provided by rule.  In cases where
      there is an appeal from a proposed decision rendered by a presiding
      officer to an intermediate reviewing body, or where such a proposed
      decision is reviewed on motion of an intermediate reviewing body, an
      opportunity shall be afforded to each party to file exceptions,
      present briefs and, with the consent of the intermediate reviewing
      body, present oral arguments to those who are to render the decision.

         5.  When an appeal from an agency decision in a contested case may
      be taken to another agency pursuant to statute, or a second agency
      may according to statute review on its own motion the decision in a
      contested case by the first agency, the appeal or review shall be
      deemed a continuous proceeding as though before one agency.  A
      decision of the first agency in such a case is a proposed decision
      and shall become the final decision without further proceedings
      unless there is an appeal to, or review on motion of, the second
      agency within the time provided by statute or rule.  In deciding an
      appeal from or review of a proposed decision of the first agency, the
      second agency shall have all those powers conferred upon it by
      statute and shall afford each party an opportunity to file
      exceptions, present briefs and, with its consent, present oral
      arguments to agency members who are to render the final decision.  
         Section History: Early Form

         [C75, 77, 79, 81, § 17A.15] 
         Section History: Recent Form
         98 Acts, ch 1202, §17, 46
         Referred to in § 10A.801, 17A.9, 86.24, 86.42, 225C.8, 421.17