(725 ILCS 172/5‑15)
(Section scheduled to be repealed July 1, 2012)
Sec. 5‑15. Funding. The Department of State Police, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall promulgate rules for the implementation of the Gang Crime Witness Protection Program. Assistance shall be subject to the following limitations:
(a) Funds shall be limited to payment of the |
|
(1) temporary living costs;
(2) moving expenses;
(3) rent;
(4) security deposits; and
(5) other appropriate expenses of relocation or |
|
(b) Approval of applications made by State's |
| Attorneys shall be conditioned upon county funding for costs at a level of at least 25%, unless this requirement is waived by the administrator, in accordance with promulgated rules, for good cause shown; | |
(c) Counties providing assistance consistent with |
| the limitations in this Act may apply for reimbursement of up to 75% of their costs; and | |
(d) No more than 50% of funding available in any |
| given fiscal year may be used for costs associated with any single county. | |
(Source: P.A. 91‑42, eff. 6‑30‑99 .) |
(725 ILCS 172/5‑35)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on July 1, 2012)
Sec. 5‑35. Continuation of Act; validation.
(a) The General Assembly finds and declares that:
(1) When the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act was |
| originally enacted by Public Act 89‑498, effective June 27, 1996, it included a Section 5‑30, which repealed the Act on June 30, 1998. | |
(2) Senate Bill 1846 of the 90th General Assembly |
| included a provision that amended the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act by changing Section 5‑30 to make the Act's repeal date June 30, 1999. Senate Bill 1846 passed both houses on May 21, 1998. Senate Bill 1846 provided that it took effect upon becoming law. Senate Bill 1846 was sent to the Governor on June 19, 1998. Senate Bill 1846 was not approved by the Governor until August 14, 1998. Senate Bill 1846 became Public Act 90‑795. | |
(3) The Statute on Statutes sets forth general rules |
| on the repeal of statutes, but Section 1 of that Act also states that these rules will not be observed when the result would be "inconsistent with the manifest intent of the General Assembly or repugnant to the context of the statute". | |
(4) The actions of the General Assembly clearly |
| manifest the intention of the General Assembly to change the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act's repeal date to June 30, 1999. | |
(5) Any construction of Section 5‑30 of the Gang |
| Crime Witness Protection Act that results in the repeal of the Act on June 30, 1998 would be inconsistent with the manifest intent of the General Assembly. | |
(b) It is hereby declared to have been the intent of the General Assembly, in enacting Public Act 90‑795, that Section 5‑30 of the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act be changed to make June 30, 1999 the repeal date of the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act, and that the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act therefore not be subject to repeal on June 30, 1998.
(c) The Gang Crime Witness Protection Act shall be deemed to have been in continuous effect since its original effective date, and it shall continue to be in effect until it is otherwise repealed.
(d) All actions taken in reliance on or pursuant to the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act by any officer or agency of State government or any other person or entity are validated.
(e) To ensure the continuing effectiveness of the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act, it is set forth in full and re‑enacted by this amendatory Act. This re‑enactment is intended as a continuation of the Act. It is not intended to supersede any amendment to the Act that is enacted by the General Assembly.
(f) This Act applies to all claims, civil actions, and proceedings pending on or filed on, before, or after the effective date of this amendatory Act.
(g) The General Assembly also intends in this amendatory Act to change the repeal date of the Gang Crime Witness Protection Act to July 1, 2004.
(Source: P.A. 91‑42, eff. 6‑30‑99 .) |