Sec. 42-397. Limitation on choice of law and venue.
Sec. 42-397. Limitation on choice of law and venue. (a) The parties to a consumer
lease may not choose the law of a jurisdiction unless it is a jurisdiction in which:
(1) The lessee principally resides when the lease is consummated;
(2) The lessee will principally reside within thirty days after the lease is consummated;
(3) The leased goods are to be used; or
(4) Subject to subsection (b) of this section, the leased goods are physically received
by the lessee.
(b) If the law chosen by the parties to a consumer lease under subdivision (4) of
subsection (a) of this section is the law of a jurisdiction other than this state and the
holder acts or initiates an action in this state to enforce rights arising from the lease
against a lessee who is a resident of this state, the following rules apply:
(1) The holder's act or action is subject to sections 42-394, 42-395, 42-396, 42-398, and 42-399 and, except for a disclosure that would have been required by sections
42-270 to 42-271a, inclusive, and 42-390 to 42-434, inclusive, to be made before the
holder's act or action, to sections 42-408 to 42-415, inclusive, and 42-418 to 42-423,
inclusive.
(2) The holder's act or action is subject to sections 42-424 to 42-431, inclusive, if
the holder's act or action violates a provision of sections 42-270 to 42-271a, inclusive,
and 42-390 to 42-434, inclusive, made applicable by this subsection.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision in a consumer lease, an action by a holder against
a lessee to enforce the holder's rights under the lease must be brought in the venue of
the lessee's residence.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision in a consumer lease, a lessee may maintain an
action against a holder in any judicial forum that otherwise has jurisdiction over the
holder.
(P.A. 02-81, S. 8.)
History: P.A. 02-81 effective July 1, 2003.