Sec. 14-107. Liability of owner, operator, lessee.
Sec. 14-107. Liability of owner, operator, lessee. (a) The owner, operator or lessee of any motor vehicle may be prosecuted jointly or individually for violation of any
provision of section 10a-79, 10a-84, 10a-92 or 10a-139, subsection (a) of section 14-13, section 14-18, section 14-39 so far as it relates to the registration of motor vehicles,
section 14-80, sections 14-80b, 14-80h, 14-80i and 14-99f, sections 14-96a to 14-96aa,
inclusive, or section 14-228, 14-251, 14-252, 14-260 or 14-267a.
(b) Whenever there occurs a violation of section 10a-79, 10a-92, 10a-139, 14-218a,
14-219, 14-222, 14-223, 14-224 or 14-253a, or sections 14-275 to 14-281, inclusive, or
a violation of an ordinance, bylaw or regulation of any town, city or borough in regard
to parking, proof of the registration number of any motor vehicle therein concerned
shall be prima facie evidence in any criminal action or in any action based on an infraction
that the owner was the operator thereof, except in the case of a leased or rented motor
vehicle, such proof shall be prima facie evidence in any criminal action that the lessee
was the operator thereof.
(1949 Rev., S. 2452; 1953, S. 1342d; February, 1965, P.A. 448, S. 14; 1969, P.A. 469; 747, S. 4; 1971, P.A. 332, S. 1;
P.A. 73-151, S. 4; 73-172; P.A. 75-198; P.A. 77-340, S. 3; P.A. 79-188, S. 6, 10; P.A. 82-138, S. 2; P.A. 84-128; 84-429,
S. 61; P.A. 85-613, S. 31, 154; P.A. 92-126, S. 38, 48; P.A. 03-278, S. 43.)
History: 1965 act deleted reference to Subsec. (a) or (b) before "section 14-80"; 1969 acts replaced reference to repealed
Secs. 14-83 to 14-88 with reference to Secs. 14-96a to 14-96aa, included lessees in provisions, allowed prosecution jointly
or individually and added exception re proof of registration number as evidence that lessee was operator; 1971 act included
reference to Sec. 10-144; P.A. 73-151 added references to Secs. 10-38k, 10-108d and 10-109d; P.A. 73-172 added references
to Secs. 13a-154 to 13a-162; P.A. 75-198 allowed prosecution for violation of "an ordinance, by law or regulation of any
town, city or borough in regard to parking"; P.A. 77-340 added reference to actions based on infractions; P.A. 79-188
replaced reference to repealed Sec. 14-267 with reference to Sec. 14-267a; P.A. 82-138 included a reference to Sec. 14-253a; P.A. 84-128 included a reference to Sec. 14-223; P.A. 84-429 made technical changes for statutory consistency;
P.A. 85-613 made technical changes; P.A. 92-126 removed references to repealed sections; P.A. 03-278 designated existing
provisions as Subsecs. (a) and (b) and made technical changes, effective July 9, 2003.
Inapplicable to civil action. 155 C. 222(fn).
Cited. 22 CS 389. Owner who has failed to use due care to prevent overloading under section 14-267 is guilty even
though he had no actual or constructive knowledge that vehicle was being overloaded. Id., 482. Cited. 23 CS 424. Cited.
30 CS 233.
Shifting of burden of proof not a denial of due process re defendant. 2 Conn. Cir. Ct. 239. Trial court rejected defendant's
rebuttal testimony re credibility. Id., 329. Cited. Id., 594. This statute as it relates to presumptive evidence does not violate
due process since there is a rational and reasonable connection between the facts proved and the ultimate fact presumed,
the prima facie inference raised being based on the common experience that as a general rule the owner of a car drives his
own vehicle. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 462, 463. Cited. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 658. Either the operator or the owner of any motor vehicle,
or both, may be prosecuted under this section for violation of the statute which punishes those who evade responsibility
in motor vehicle operation, section 14-224. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 561. Registration of motor vehicle being prima facie evidence
as to the operator of an offending vehicle is constitutionally valid and does not violate the fourteenth amendment. Fifth
amendment protection against self-incrimination is not violated because it is not necessary for one to testify to rebut it. 6
Conn. Cir. Ct. 298.