Search Results
| Case name | Citation | Summary |
| [Arizona] FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL v COLIN FRIEDMAN et al | 2010/08/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0096-CQ Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
| [Arizona] McLAUGHLIN/UNITED FOOD v BENNETT/SOS BALLOT et al | 2010/09/02 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0205-AP/EL A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
| [Arizona] PETERSEN/BURK v PURCELL/COVEY et al | 2010/09/27 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0278-AP/EL Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v JESUS HUMBERTO SOTO | 2010/11/15 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-10-0089 Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v MIKE PETER GALLARDO | 2010/11/30 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-09-0171-AP W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). Holding A.R.S. §§ 13-751 to -759 (capital sentencing scheme) constitutional under U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) and U.S. Const. amend 14 (due process). |
| [Arizona] MARIANNE WALDOW et al v JAMES LAPORTA | 2010/12/02 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-10-0102-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v BRAD ALAN BOWSHER | 2010/12/08 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-10-0019-PR A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; James A Soto, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-903(A) (calculation of periods of probation) constitutional despite retroactivity claims under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). |
| [Arizona] In the Matters of JEFFREY PHILLIPS/ROBERT ARENTZ | 2010/12/16 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: SB-10-0036-D A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Jon W Thompson, Concur; Sheldon H Weisberg, Concur in part, Dissent in part |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v JOSEPH WESLEY GOMEZ | 2010/12/22 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-09-0339-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
| [Arizona] In the Matter of JANET L WHITE-STEINER | 2009/01/08 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: SB-08-0119-D W. Scott Bales, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur |
| [Arizona] VALERIE M. v ADES/KAYDEE V./RANDY V./ZACHARY V. | 2009/01/12 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0252-PR W. Scott Bales, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF AZ v HON. HICKS/RAPHAEL DURNAN | 2009/01/12 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0174-PR Michael D. Ryan, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] LEAGUE OF AZ CITIES AND TOWNS v MARTIN/NAPOLITANO | 2009/02/03 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0379-SA Rebecca White Berch, Author; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding H.B. 2209 § 47 (2008) (requiring cities and towns to make payments into the state general fund) unconstitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 2, § 20 (appropriation bill shall embrace nothing but appropriations) |
| [Arizona] MAYER USD et al v MARK WINKLEMAN et al | 2009/02/13 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0225 Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur in part; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] CITY OF PHOENIX et al v HON. FIELDS/ PEREZ et al | 2009/02/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0159-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] LAURA SEISINGER v SCOTT SIEBEL MD | 2009/03/13 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0224-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Peter J Eckerstrom, Concur in part; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 12-2604(A) (requirements for expert witnesses to prove the standard of care in medical malpractice cases) constitutional and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 3 (separation of powers), U.S. Const. arts. 1-3 (separation of powers), Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(5) (the Arizona Supreme Court has the power to make rules relative to all procedural matters in any court). Eckerstrom, J. (dissenting in part) would have found the statute unconstitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(5). |
| [Arizona] SHANNON BACKUS/ROSEMARY JOHNSON v STATE/ADOC | 2009/03/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0284-PR Ruth V. McGregor, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] DAVIS/CHINO GRANDE v AGUA SIERRA RESOURCES et al | 2009/03/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0163-PR W. Scott Bales, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur |
| [Arizona] STATE OF ARIZONA v JOHN HERBERT SHRUM | 2009/03/19 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CR-08-0312-PR Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
| [Arizona] CAIN/BAHR/HOLCOMB et al v HORNE/GEROUX/WECK et al | 2009/03/25 | Court: Arizona Supreme Court Docket No: CV-08-0189-PR Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Ann A Scott Timmer, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. §§ 15-891 to -891.06 (school voucher program for children with disabilities) and A.R.S. §§ 15-817 to -817.07 (school voucher program for foster children) unconstitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 9 § 10 (No appropriation of public money made in aid of any church, or private or sectarian school) |