1942.9—Planning, bidding, contracting, and constructing. [See §§ 1942.17(p) and 1942.18]

(a) Review of construction plans and specifications. All plans and specifications will be submitted as soon as available to the State Office for review and comments.
(b) Contract approval. The State Director or designee is responsible for approving all construction contracts using legal advice and guidance of OGC as necessary. The use of a contracting method under § 1942.18(l) of this subpart exceeding $100,000 must be concurred in by the National Office. Procurement under § 1942.18(l) of this subpart will not be considered when an FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 grant is involved. When an applicant requests such concurrence, the State Director will submit the following to the National Office:
(1) State Director's and FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 engineer/architect's comments and recommendations, and when noncompetitive negotiation is proposed, submit an evaluation of previous work of the proposed construction firm.
(2) Regional attorney's opinion and comments regarding the legal adequacy of the proposed procurement method and proposed contract documents.
(3) Copy of owner's written request and description of the procurement method proposed.
(4) Copy of the proposed contract.
(c) Bid irregularities. Any irregularities in the bids received or other matters pertaining to the contract award having legal implications will be cleared with OGC before the State Director consents to the contract award.
(d) Noncompliance. State Directors, upon receipt of information indicating borrowers or their officers, employees, or agents are not performing in compliance with § 1942.18(j)(1) of this subpart, may request the Regional Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to investigate the matter and provide a report. The State Director is responsible for resolving the issue.

Code of Federal Regulations

[50 FR 7296, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 6787, Mar. 3, 1988]