103.23—Factors in determining whether to disclose information pursuant to a demand.
(a) General considerations.
In authorizing disclosures pursuant to a proper demand for Customs information, one which complies with the provisions of § 103.22(c), the Chief Counsel should consider the following factors:
(1)
Whether the disclosure would be appropriate under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege;
(2)
Whether the disclosure would be appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose; and,
(i)
Relevant and material to the action pending, based on copies of the summons and complaint that are required to be attached to the subpoena duces tecum or other demand;
(iv)
Reasonable in its scope, i.e., the documents, information, or testimony sought are described with particularity.
(4)
Whether consultation with the originating component requires that the Chief Counsel make a separate determination as to the disclosure of the information requested.
(b) Circumstances where disclosure will not be made.
Among the demands in response to which disclosure will not be authorized by the Chief Counsel are those demands with respect to which any of the following factors exist:
(1)
Disclosure would violate a treaty, statute (such as the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905, or the income tax laws, 26 U.S.C. 6103 and 7213 ), or a rule of procedure, such as the grand jury secrecy rule, Fed.R.Crim.Proc. rule 6(e) (18 U.S.C.App.);
(5)
Disclosure would reveal investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes, interfere with enforcement proceedings, or disclose investigative techniques and procedures;
(6)
Disclosure would improperly reveal confidential commercial information without the owner's consent (e.g., entry information);
(9)
Customs has no interest, records, or other official information regarding the matter in which disclosure is sought;